I have even found that I have fallen AD & D always been very much. Not only was because the first two role-playing game books that I in English received, and I had also made a not zuverachtenden leap in my knowledge of English, but because it is still a very useful and playable Game .
What can be said for the game with AD & D, in my view and experience is related be with my "house rules" for the Saga system essay-stated way.
I want at this point already say that I will refer only to the two former "ground rules" ( Player's Handbook and Dungeon Master's Guide ), as a major part of the bloated, stupid and useless "Rule Extensions ( The Complete ... Handbooks et al.) merely constitute an attempt, the demand for "talent-based systems" to breastfeed and the "class system" get away. Both are wrong, but the players were generally better off, simply zuzulegen another in this regard sophisticated game system, but to keep the clumsy attempts a "big game system on the market to deliver - and due to this . Pay Who wanted to stand because of nostalgia (and somewhat proud defiance?) In AD & D, which could remain in the ground rules - with their own additions.
So I'll use the AD & D system to explain the game and show that if you only read thoroughly to find the most thoughtful answers to most questions in the principles themselves, because in the 2nd Edition many years of playing experience incorporated.
My concern, however, not about the eternal debate about the best (most realistic, most complex, most accurate, modern, etc. - spielbarste occurs mostly not at all ...) game system to continue, but the application of a game system and the consequences for players and the game ..
"The game system determines the game reality."
(The House Rules - Alexander-Lars Dallmann)
0 comments:
Post a Comment